Azure Architecture Assessment
Understand the current state, identify material risks, and decide what to change before committing to more build work.
Discuss this engagementWhen it fits
Azure costs are rising, ownership is unclear, or a workload needs an architecture review before its next investment or production release.
What changes
An evidence-backed view of the system and a prioritized decision and action plan.
What you receive
- Current-state architecture and evidence register
- Findings across security, reliability, cost, operations, and performance within the agreed scope
- Risk and owner map with documented tradeoffs
- Prioritized action plan and executive readout
What we agree first
- A named workload or platform boundary
- Business objectives, constraints, and decision makers
- Architecture information and agreed evidence access
Scope, fee, acceptance criteria, and timing are agreed before work starts.
Scope boundaries
Implementation, intrusive testing, certification, and tenant changes are not included unless separately agreed.
View example deliverablesCloud Adoption Framework or Well-Architected: Which One Answers Your Question
The two Azure frameworks answer different questions; use the Cloud Adoption Framework for estate decisions and the Well-Architected Framework for a single workload, and name the control owner where they overlap.
What does your team need to settle?
Bring the system, the business goal, and the constraints. Scope, deliverables, and fee are agreed before work starts.
Discuss this engagement