Architecture Logic
Architecture Logic is where Azure architecture choices get written down before they harden into platform defaults. The point is not to cover every service. The point is to make the tradeoff clear enough that another architect can challenge it.
Architecture before platform
Product names come after the operating boundary, the owner, and the failure mode. A platform choice is only useful when someone can run it.
Evidence over certainty
The writing takes a position, but it does not pretend Azure is static. Claims are sourced, qualified, or removed.
Evidence that does work
Sources, caveats, and revision notes have to make the claim inspectable. If evidence does not change the decision, it does not belong in the article.
Start with the fork
Each article begins with a choice an Azure team has to make: which boundary to draw, which service to operate, which risk to accept, or which path to leave alone.
Read the current articleShow the work
Sources stay visible, claims carry verification dates, and visual arguments stay out until they earn their place.
See the sourcesRevise the same URL
Azure changes. When an article changes with it, the updated date moves and the reason is written down, so older links do not become a junk drawer.
Latest articleKeep the pitch out
Architecture Logic is owned by RedDogSME, but the prose is not a sales funnel. The article should be useful before anyone cares who published it.